|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVjXrOqTgCKgwoHgMmuc+tussaMw4mWhNqO=Zx_URDasw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:16:14 -0600 From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> Cc: sam@circlenet.us, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote: >> Now it would be trivial to setup syslog and sshd to give only the sessions >> that complete the handshake, however I'm also not sure how responsive some >> of the abuse contacts may be. I'll keep my restrictive network settings for >> the time being. > > That's the main problem: you can generate the report but if it's about > some doofus in Dubai what are the odds of it doing any good? And then we're right back to sending the offending packets to a black hole. *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |