[166774] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Do you obfuscate email headers when reporting spam issues to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Nov 7 14:21:37 2013
In-Reply-To: <20131107184300.GA24905@gsp.org>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:20:24 -0500
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:31:54PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> If you know you have pro spammers on your network, the question
>> isn't how much to obfuscate spam complaints you receive...it's why
>> haven't you terminated the customer(s)?
>
> Another question is "why are you relying on third parties to tell you
> that abuse is outbound from your operation? Why don't you already know?"
Because the folks watching packets from Internet customers do have
three letters but the three letters are NSA not ISP.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
