[166755] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Do you obfuscate email headers when reporting spam issues to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.)
Wed Nov 6 17:47:05 2013
From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell@isipp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVfTF_-qg9VgmwqjzhXx7W4kxmXc=S-Zag7jM6zLMqUvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:46:52 -0700
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> so aside from the abusers his customers will tend to
> be heavy on single-recipient administrative emails rather than mailing
> lists.
Then, if they are truly one-to-one administrative emails, that's rather =
odd if they are generating a disproportionate number of spam complaints, =
dontcha think? Unless they are inserting too much marketing into to =
them (always dicey).
>> Failure to do so can (and usually does)
>> result in termination of their accreditation
>=20
> Accreditation of what?
I'll respond more fully to this offlist, as it's OT, but the short =
answer is that we accredit email senders who are adhering to best =
practices (not unlike ReturnPath, only we're the other white meat).
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003
CEO/President
Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
http://www.ISIPP.com=20
Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
How do you get to the inbox instead of the spam filter? SuretyMail!
Helping businesses keep their email out of the junk folder since 1998
http://www.isipp.com/SuretyMail
