[166683] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How anti-NSA backlash could fracture the Internet along national
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Popovitch)
Sun Nov 3 18:35:20 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZs18duia8kHGtBFwScS9RM-agRv5MadUUXOH3XV-t2wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:35:08 -0500
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can't be the only one to have been following this 12.8TB of neat-o-ness:
>>
>> http://www.bricscable.com/
>
> " 34 000 km, 2 fibre pair, 12.8 Tbit/s"
>
> so.... you can get 80 waves on a single pair, 80 100g waves? that's 8tbps
> where's the missing 6 in the above? Did the other pair only get 40g
> waves? that seems short sighted :(
The remaining bandwidth is obviously for network management polling. lol :-)
-Jim P.
