[16667] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Germann)
Fri May 8 13:34:24 1998
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 13:08:57 -0400
To: jeyers@ialn.com
From: Eric Germann <ekgermann@CCTEC.COM>
Cc: CMartin@mercury.balink.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <31AE7BF888BAD111B91000805F31181C076BC5@iamsx01.intractsys.
com>
Err, buy decent hardware and it will.
400,000 hits per day. Six months with narry a hiccup. PPro 200 with 128MB
RAM.
Also, if you're looking for a Radius solution to interface with a real
relational db, NT works out a LOT cheaper than Sybase or Oracle on Unix.
Eric
At 08:06 AM 5/8/98 -0400, jeyers@ialn.com wrote:
>Depends on the size of your network. "Scaleability and stability" and
>NT rarely go together...
>
>Jerry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin, Christian [SMTP:CMartin@mercury.balink.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 8:48 PM
>> To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
>> Subject: CiscoSecure NT vs CS UNIX
>>
>> All Ye NANOG readers,
>>
>> Does anyone use CiscoSecure ACS for NT to control router access? If
>> so,
>> has anyone used the UNIX one and done a comparison? I need to
>> evaluate
>> these tools as a replacement for the TACACS+ daemon available from
>> Cisco. Any info would be appreciated, particularly scalability and
>> stability.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian
>
