[166602] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: large scale ipsec
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jan Schaumann)
Fri Nov 1 13:06:58 2013
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:06:44 -0400
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Mail-Followup-To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZ4ySpk9NaWTHhXpwSsMZcHz5bh8J=BBd+-HA5qJH_k1g@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
=20
> One might look at MS's documentation about deploying end-to-end ipsec
> in their enterprise for one example of peer-to-peer ubiquitous ipsec.
This is interesting and kind of what I'm looking for. Do you have a
pointer to this documentation?
My apologies for not having defined "large scale" in my original mail.
What I had in mind was, basically, environments ranging with multiple
datacenters (possibly across the globe) pushing tens of gb/s or more.
Though I suppose I'd also be interested in any other scale, both larger
and smaller. I'd be glad to collect any information you may want to
send me off-list and report back with a summary, if that's preferred.
-Jan
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBUnPfpGbOT+lva9PXAQJM8Qf/UDry2zqs/wtaUI2mi52lnCfD7APNEkFO
KbW9cC8G21S9Q15bbaxFWDb7USMm8i/nRXam9wjSyIt3oShkQUsto3GFsns6G1rK
RYaWDt5CVNcNRo776YWZ3MGcOLpJ3vCqn1R7l2Ij/zDncuurctst2319oMN0jQ2R
cVz3aTbCU30N0ac+N08bBaQ7R5qrHln7VrWNFdWu2I253/LCotga8ym1dzKzDrpV
VXt7fqVLhB6xyppuslQtz6AeIzvIWdqeLcy+gBVTrRNqSF7ZC9bHKczyowSmgLK7
rvqAEn2XAWXW/1KmwiQQvG/FUHC0Xe71RjEJ/ZnLurXV/wk5jVzAKg==
=jwFe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--
