|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 07:11:53 PST From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@parc.xerox.com> To: huitema@pax.inria.fr (Christian Huitema) Cc: peter@unipalm.pipex.com, nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, iab@isi.edu In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 29 Jan 1996 03:19:19 -0800 > Yes. Combine this with IP over Direct-TV, where the PC address must be > synchronized between the out-bound telephone channel (semi-permanent) and > the in-bound satellite channel (permanent). Also combine with IP mobility, > which assumes that the mobile is keeping its IP address while roaming. > Also combine with IP over CATv, where a PC at home has essentially the same > requirement as a PC at work. > > All in all, at least one address per computer is a very reasonable goal, > one which we have zero reason to legislate away. I agree with Christian completely Lixia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |