[166445] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: BGP failure analysis and recommendations

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Weeks)
Thu Oct 24 23:24:01 2013

Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:22:49 -0700
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org



--- courtneysmith@comcast.net wrote:
From: Courtney Smith <courtneysmith@comcast.net>
> From: JRC NOC <nospam-nanog@jensenresearch.com>

> Regrettably, during the outage our BGP session remained active and we 
> continued receiving full routes from the affected AS.  And our prefixes 
> continued to be advertised at their border. However basically none of the 


Did you provider provide an official written RFO yet?  
------------------------------------------------------------


When deciding to keep or change providers after a major mistake 
like this is do they send out an honest description of the mistake 
and what has been done to stop it from happening again in the future.  
Corporatespeak reports are grounds for dismissal!    ;-)

scott


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post