[166418] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv6 and geolocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jen Linkova)
Wed Oct 23 07:58:23 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAA5Ek4f9JXTKaQUVhTz-2=x+mZX1x1rp_Tne=bv6Zqze_fLvPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:57:44 +0200
To: Blair Trosper <blair.trosper@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Blair Trosper <blair.trosper@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everyone loves IPv6, and it's a fantastic technology. However, I've been
> pondering a few quirks of v6, including the low priority of PTR, but I have
> a question I want to throw out there:
>
> Do you think IPv6 geolocatoin (GeoIP) will ever be viable?
You might find this interesting:
https://ripe67.ripe.net/presentations/324-self-published-geo_RIPE67.pdf
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-google-self-published-geofeeds-02
