[16625] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Core router bakeoff?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Thu May 7 19:52:18 1998
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 18:45:21 -0500
From: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
To: perry@piermont.com
Cc: Gregory Mirsky <gmirsky@BayNetworks.COM>, Rob M VanHooren <rob@linkd.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199805072133.RAA00572@jekyll.piermont.com>; from Perry E. Metzger on Thu, May 07, 1998 at 05:33:03PM -0400
On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 05:33:03PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> Gregory Mirsky writes:
> > Perry, may I ask why you exclude Bay and 3Com? Any particular bad
> > experience from the previous life?
>
> I've only actually had bad experience with Bay stuff -- 3Com isn't
> even in the running for the most part -- the software doesn't even
> pretend to be able to do the job for a backbone.
>
> > And Rob, it you're building a backbone I'd add Ascend's GRF to the list.
>
> Actually, I rather like the architecture of the GRF, though I must
> admit to have never tried one out. I've heard some good things and
> they might be worth a test or two.
>
> Perry
Well, the GRF has its good and bad points. I've tested one rather
extensively, although I admit it was some time (~8-9 months) ago.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
| NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
