[166228] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Mon Oct 14 19:49:07 2013
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:48:33 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <525C7078.6060404@staticsafe.ca>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/14/13 3:30 PM, staticsafe wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 18:00, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>> Which other provider? Please name at least one.
>>
>> Other providers either offer IPv6, or don't. When those other
>> providers do, good or bad, you can connect to any other IPv6 network
>> (well, except maybe for Cogent's AS174).
>>
>> When Cogent offers IPv6, a lot of IPv6 networks are unreachable. No
>> other provider comes close.
>>
>> I mean, even their web-site doesn't work from many IPv6-connected
>> hosts, because there's no route for their network:
>>
>> li163-XXX:~# telnet cogentco.com http
>> Trying 2001:550:1::cc01...
>> ^C
>> li163-XXX:~#
>>
>> C.
>
> Fremont Linode? I see it is unreachable from my ARP Networks VPS (HE v6
> transit) and also from behind my HE tunnel at home.
>
HE and Cogen't don't peer, even after the cake.
~Seth
