[166001] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Mon Sep 30 11:28:34 2013
In-Reply-To: <CALOgxGYvy=bH=cRAdR6zCrmi1p9=MR6PgspG3H=v_1XADRm48A@mail.gmail.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:27:26 -0400
To: TJ Evans <trejrco@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:46 AM, TJ <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:32 AM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
>> IPv4 jumped from 8 bits to
>> 32 bits. Which when you think about it is the same ratio as jumping
>> from 32 bits to 128 bits.
>
> Only insofar as the jump from 1 to 1000 is the same as the jump from 1000
> is to 1000000 ... :)
If we're on an exponential growth curve, it's the same ratio. Are we?
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
