[16596] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: VIX Looking Glass (was: AS1853 announcing default)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul G. Donner)
Thu May 7 07:07:00 1998

Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 03:13:02 -0400
To: "Christian Panigl, ACOnet/UniVie" <panigl@cc.univie.ac.at>,
        ferguson@cisco.com
From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner@cisco.com>
Cc: smd@ebone.net, noc@aco.net, nanog@merit.edu, panigl@cc.univie.ac.at
In-Reply-To: <009C5CA3.4B7E0D3C.3@cc.univie.ac.at>

Christian,

The terminology I used was incorrect.  What I meant to say was:
"it appears that AS1853 is announcing a default route (to the 
Looking Glass at VIX -> at least)."  I was merely seeking an 
explanation and wandering if this is what was really intended,
not knowing myself exactly what was intended by this announce.

Regards,

-Donner

p.s. Paul - if you want to forward this to NANOG for me...


At 06:14 PM 5/6/98 MET, Christian Panigl, ACOnet/UniVie wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 11:50:55 -0400
>>From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
>
>    Hi Paul,
>    
>    and whoever might have gotten nervous about our (AS1853) "default-route":
>    
>    please calm down, there is no such beast, and we have never announced a
>    default-route "at the Vienna Internet eXchange" (http://www.vix.at/).  
>    Please read below my answer/explanation to Paul Donner,  the rumour is
>    based on a misinterpretation ...
>
>    As I'm not subscriber to the NANOG list, my CC to this list will most
>    probably bounce back, therefore, Paul, please forward my answer there !!!
>    
>    Regards
>    CP
>    
>=======================================
>Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 13:23:32 MET-DST
>From: "Christian Panigl, ACOnet/UniVie" <panigl@cc.univie.ac.at>
>To: pdonner@cisco.com
>CC: helpdesk@aco.net, panigl@cc.univie.ac.at
>Subject: VIX Looking Glass
>
>>Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 04:32:14 -0400
>>From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner@cisco.com>
>>To: helpdesk@aco.net
>>
>>You guys are annoucing a default route at VIX.  Is this what you really 
>>want to be doing?  I found this while using LOOKING GLASS.  For example, 
>>I was looking for a route to block 209.58.48.0/20.  Now AS1583 does not
>>advertise a route for this block but they do offer to route any traffic
>>that is destined for this block.  So you will be blackholing traffic
>>destined for this site from any of your peers.
>
>    Dear Paul Donner,
>    
>    thanks for your hint.  However, we are NOT announcing a default route
>    "at VIX".  AS1853 (ACOnet Backbone) is announcing a default route to
>    AS1120 (ACOnet/VIX Service AS).  The router Service.ACO.net/AS1120 is
>    offering access to some special servers/services for all VIX members and
>    is open to peer with all VIX members.  Also the "VIX Looking Glass" is
>    asking this router, which, besides of its VIX peerings, does not have
>    any (not to speak about full) explicit routing information but a default
>    route to the ACOnet Backbone (AS1853).  This default route is NOT
>    re-advertised to any VIX peer !
>    
>    This looking glass wrt routing table therefore has only local meaning
>    for VIX members and their customers.  We might think of placing an
>    explicit note there explaining the situation.
>    
>    Thanks for your input anyway !
>    Regards
>    CP
>    
> ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
> --- Christian Panigl        : Vienna University Computer Center  -
ACOnet ---
> --- VUCC - ACOnet - VIX     :
-------------------------------------------- ---
> --- Universitaetsstrasse 7  : Mail:  Panigl@CC.UniVie.ac.at    (CP8-RIPE)
 ---
> --- A-1010 Vienna / Austria :  Tel:  +43 1 4277-14032         (Fax:
-9140) ---
> ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post