[165953] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darren Pilgrim)
Thu Sep 26 15:29:43 2013
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:29:17 -0700
From: Darren Pilgrim <nanog@bitfreak.org>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20130926085250.GA8058@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/26/2013 1:52 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space
exhaustion. IPv4's address space was too small for such large thinking.
IPv6 is far beyond enough to use such allocation policies.
