[165850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 32-bit ASN acceptance by ISPs in ARIN region
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Sep 23 10:52:55 2013
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:28:58 +1000."
<D7D71670-6B59-418B-A4D7-912FFC244F84@apnic.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:46:13 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1379947573_3009P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:28:58 +1000, Geoff Huston said:
> Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of RFC5668?
> I was not aware that there were residual issues here.
I wonder what the correlation is between sites that haven't deployed
5668, sites that haven't deployed IPv6, and sites that haven't deployed BCP38.
--==_Exmh_1379947573_3009P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=+w6L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1379947573_3009P--
