[165703] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The block message is 521 DNSRBL: Blocked for abuse
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Wed Sep 18 22:46:30 2013
To: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:31:31 -0400."
<523A6203.8090504@trelane.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:46:04 +1000
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <523A6203.8090504@trelane.net>, Andrew D Kirch writes:
> On 9/18/2013 9:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >> This is pathetic. ARIN is supposed to be working as a steward of this
> >> IP space. When you have policies that make it more difficult to use the
> >> IP space this isn't even remotely close to stewardship. It's pathetic,
> > Unfortunately, a surprising number of "new" IP space owners turn out
> > to be the sleazy old IP space owners under a differnt fake name.
> >
> > R's,
> > John
> or put another way, spammers lie.
>
> Andrew
Which is irrelevent to removing a address block on the basis of a
RIR recording that the block has been reallocated. A reallocation
already goes through a quarantine period though that may get shorter
as time goes on.
A transfer on the other hand doesn't.
There may be some use in recording whether a address block is
transfered or allocated. Note I'm not sure if the allocation
date gets updated on a transfer or not.
There may be some use in recording when a address block is
quarantined.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
