[16568] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Two renumbering questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John R. Levine)
Tue May 5 14:36:50 1998
Date: 5 May 1998 17:34:08 -0000
From: johnl@iecc.com (John R. Levine)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <354EAEE1.5034@meganet.net>
>> If it is a singleton hole in a /18, your most net-friendly action would
>> be to voluntarily renumber. The provider's most net-friendly action
>> would be to indicate it was non-portable.
In case I didn't make it clear in my original question, I figured I'd
probably have to renumber -- I was more wondering if I had the option
to hold on to the old addresses for a little while during the
transition, since the overlap I'll get between the old and new
upstreams will (for a variety of reasons) probably not be very long.
--
John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 387 6869
johnl@iecc.com, Village Trustee and Sewer Commissioner, http://iecc.com/johnl,
Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
