[165653] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue Sep 17 14:14:10 2013

From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <52386F91.5020801@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:13:36 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--Apple-Mail=_43568A00-652C-491D-BA2B-7229838388E1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:04 , Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> On 17/09/2013 14:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

>> And yes, DE-CIX is more than well aware everyone thinks this is .. uh =
..
>> let's just call it "silly" for now, although most would use far more
>> disparaging words. Which is probably why no serious IXP does it.
>=20
> It's not silly

We disagree.


> it's just not what everyone else does

I don't think anyone else does 2 minutes, but happy to be educated =
otherwise.


> so it's not
> possible to directly compare stats with other ixps.  I'm all in favour =
of
> using short (but technically sensible) sampling intervals for internal
> monitoring, but there are good reasons to use 300s / ingress sum for
> prettypics intended for public consumption.

Your IXP (network, whatever), you decision. Use 2 second timers for all =
I care.

Unfortunately, DE-CIX has done exactly what you said - compared =
themselves to other IXPs using that apples-to-oranges comparison. There =
are words for that sort of thing, but they are impolite, and I otherwise =
like the people at DE-CIX, so I shall let each NANOG-ite decide how to =
view such, um, tactics.

--=20
TTFN,
patrick



--Apple-Mail=_43568A00-652C-491D-BA2B-7229838388E1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOJvQAAoJEHZX8udmu5TXzLYH/2TfqMf8oR0aAJVhnUpoBODi
/k+VlpmbKGCAjUsh3PIOzkNdvDGuKzw4gjh6H6qSPYpS/h4Px8IKwUsDSCpP3kMi
plyhWC+/LXfx/gkBy89Y2umqcYkDXVeF5QJZEDfKLirPMI2PuXqniYx++tb37cba
tAbyrllV1ypqdYbqZXZcw/2+U3YC3ktDi2TycpBKVzVCvSci60jBX/t1Wc83oQr6
PbbftFKSJp55j9nTZ+AK/mm3eR7VXB+v76JtTcarCMK681aDWqrF/AceqylImWmc
9BkhMkgMMA7tlLzCzIfbDIfMKCfjGpMHncygZRgc9l70C2t2qYSl9d8aqtSEksc=
=25DQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_43568A00-652C-491D-BA2B-7229838388E1--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post