[165547] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet Surveillance and Boomerang Routing: A Call for Canadian
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tei'')
Sat Sep 7 21:55:02 2013
In-Reply-To: <560F18AA-D2EB-41EE-9AB0-21D60EEF73DB@arbor.net>
From: "<<\"tei''>>>" <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:54:28 -0700
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 7 September 2013 18:09, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
>> As a result, these transmissions expose Canadians to potential U.S. surv=
eillance activities =E2=80=93 a violation of Canadian network sovereignty."
>
> Yes, far better to keep those communications within Canada - where CSEC c=
an hand them over to GCHQ, who'll then hand them over to NSA . . .
But I don't think every secret service have installed his own
backdoors in all popular software and protocols.
And the NSA can't share these backdoors/weakness with all his
"friends", because if you tell a secret to everyone, it stop being a
secret. The existence and nature of these backdoors will be revealed,
and the affected software will fix them.
So probably the NSA works like Wall-Mart Secrets. And they sell
secrets, 100.000$ for a list of human rights activist, 2 millions
for the emails of the leaders of the opposition.
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
