[16543] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SMURF AMPLIFIER BLOCK LIST -- VERY LARGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri May 1 13:44:15 1998

Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 13:28:04 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Tim Salo <salo@networkcs.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199805011647.LAA10207@us.networkcs.com>; from Tim Salo on Fri, May 01, 1998 at 11:47:19AM -0500

On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Tim Salo wrote:
> It would be interesting to see if the use of these networks as smurf
> aplifiers increases once they are published on nanog.

	I agree.  It would be interesting to see.

> (Are we doing all the hard work for the smurfers, namely creating a 
> consolidated list of all of the known smurf amplifiers?)

	It actually increases the likeleyhood that they will get
filtered, noticed, and fixed by the owner of the ip space.  If
a few of us filter them, and they start to get used as amplifiers,
they will start to notice a bit more (hopefully) that their
connectivity is starting to suck, by sending out all these icmp 
replies, and track it down.

	- Jared

-- 
       Work: jared@qual.net - We Make The Internet Work for Your Business
	     9-5pm(ET) 800 637 4424x2634 - 24x7 NOC - 800 424 3223
	    pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post