[165362] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: subrate SFP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Sat Aug 31 02:27:18 2013
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:26:55 +0300
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_ug17+LyKiL=yxpV13Dfa6_NcCkrGMM=sA-JmcAWsTRHb6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On (2013-08-30 11:30 -0400), Tim Durack wrote:
> It would be interesting to have some other smart SFP options too, like
> macsec for example...
Or HQoS in a SFP, for that one port which kills your ability to get away
with cheap L3-switch style box :)
But tbh the moment you'll need control-plane in the SFP, it becomes
complicated for me to deploy, as then I need to figure out configuration
backups, provisioning support etc.
--
++ytti
