[165298] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon So Cal issues?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Ridder)
Wed Aug 28 12:31:59 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAFG21oit3Jmzu7yjhuthsZQ=G2oPpF0RLQ97zS6a--iQjG7nLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:27:52 -0700
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
To: Todd Lyons <tlyons@ivenue.com>
Cc: "nanog \(nanog@nanog.org\)" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
There is definitely a VZ / LVL3 issue
http://www.internetpulse.net/
It is affecting VZ's Atlanta node but not Boston node:
http://www.internetpulse.net/Main.aspx?OriginValue=Level3&OriginLevel=1&DestinationValue=Verizon&DestinationLevel=1&Metric=TCP
-Grant
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Todd Lyons <tlyons@ivenue.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:25 AM, James Laszko <jamesl@mythostech.com>
> wrote:
> > We are seeing huge latency and packet loss issues with Verizon
> (DSL/FIOS) in Southern California. Does anyone have any insight? Issues
> started around 8:10AM Pacific.
>
> Been using FIOS served from the Pomona plant all morning with no
> issues, so I'd suspect it's a locational issue, not regional. Or per
> David's post, maybe it's dependent upon what you're accessing; I've
> been mostly VPN'd to the office (VZ -> Alter -> Savvis), which doesn't
> touch David's paths.
>
> ...Todd
> --
> The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
> If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
> send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
>
>
