[165230] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Emile Aben)
Tue Aug 27 04:45:48 2013
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:45:25 +0200
From: Emile Aben <emile.aben@ripe.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20130827065522.GA26981@pob.ytti.fi>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 27/08/2013 08:55, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2013-08-27 00:01 +0000), Christopher Palmer wrote:
>
>> If anyone has any data or anecdotes, please feel free to send an off-list email or whatever.
>
> [ytti@ytti.fi ~]% ssh ring ring-all -t90 ping -s 1473 -c2 -w3 ip.fi|pastebinit
> http://p.ip.fi/KA7N
>
> [ytti@sci ~]% curl -s http://p.ip.fi/KA7N|grep transmitted|wc -l
> 224
> [ytti@sci ~]% curl -s http://p.ip.fi/KA7N|grep "0 received"|wc -l
> 10
>
> UUOC wc, but that's how I roll.
>
> 224 vantage points, 10 failed.
Same tests from RIPE Atlas pings towards
nl-ams-as3333.anchors.atlas.ripe.net today:
48 byte ping: 42 out of 3406 vantage points fail (1.0%)
1473 byte ping: 180 out of 3540 vantage points fail (5.1%)
Of the 180 vantage points that failed for the 1473 byte ping, 142 were
successful in receiving at least 1 reply for the 48 byte ping.
Measurement IDs in RIPE Atlas are 1019675 and 1019676.
Emile Aben
RIPE NCC
