[165148] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrell)
Wed Aug 21 06:40:15 2013
In-Reply-To: <83227146-C0F2-430F-A7B9-970E96480D9C@pch.net>
From: Christopher Morrell <christopher.morrell.nanog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:38:47 -0400
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I think CANIX in Toronto has been dead for years. I used to operate the swit=
ch for it in my days at UUNET in the 90s.=20
In Montreal, is anyone at the Peer1 exchange other than Peer1?
On 2013-08-20, at 23:14, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
>=20
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Christopher Morrell <christopher.morrell.nano=
g@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In Winnipeg, isn't there also the WPGIX? Do you have two competing IXPs i=
n Winnipeg?
>=20
> There are nominally competing efforts in Winnipeg (MBIX and WPGIX), Calgar=
y (YYCIX and AlbertaIX), Montreal (QIX and Peer1), Vancouver (BCIX and Peer1=
), and even Toronto (TorIX, Peer1, CANIX, and IIX).
>=20
> I would not characterize more than one of those in each city as a going co=
ncern, however.
>=20
> https://pch.net/ixpdir
>=20
> -Bill
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
