[165062] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: will ISP peer with 2 local WAN routers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Carpenter)
Fri Aug 16 17:18:11 2013
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
In-Reply-To: <CB0745D4-5CD6-4866-8A07-2AC12C2CA0D6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: Justin Vocke <justin.vocke@gmail.com>
Cc: "<nanog@nanog.org>" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Time Warner installed a Juniper EX4200 as the CPE device for us, so we conne=
cted 2 routers and had two separate BGP sessions. They have us a /29 to acco=
mplish it.
-Randy
On Aug 16, 2013, at 16:53, Justin Vocke <justin.vocke@gmail.com> wrote:
> The gotcha with that is then you need a switch in front of the routers. I'=
d just setup a carrier on each router and run ibgp between.
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
> On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:35 PM, "Adam Greene" <maillist@webjogger.net> wrote:=
>=20
>> Hi guys,
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> I have a customer who peers via eBGP with Lightpath aka Cablevision (AS
>> 6128) and Level3 (AS 3356) and wants to do some dual-WAN router redundanc=
y.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> I have heard that carriers will sometimes agree to set up a /29 WAN subne=
t
>> for a customer and peer with (2) customer routers.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> The customer is delaying on providing me with the proper circuit ID &
>> contact information to be able to call Lightpath and Level3 directly and
>> find out if they will do this, so I thought of asking this list.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Is anyone aware if Lightpath and Level3 will agree to something like this=
?=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>>=20
>> Adam
>=20
>=20
