[165037] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: WaPo writes about vulnerabilities in Supermicro IPMIs

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Thu Aug 15 23:43:43 2013

Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <650753103856f99b2ad6b2c03e4eb6d7@jonesy.com.au>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Jones" <aj@jonesy.com.au>

> > Well, *I* would firewall eth1 from eth0 and cross-over eth1 to the ILO jack;
> > let the box be the firewall. Sure, it's still as breakable as the box
> > proper, but security-by-obscurity isn't *bad*, it's just *not good
> > enough*.
> 
> That's great until you muck up your firewall config or the kernel
> hangs etc. and you're up for a trip to the data centre.

Sure.  But if you can reduce 1% to 1% of 1%, then you've still done something
useful.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post