[164850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Aug 6 02:58:22 2013
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 08:58:07 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <CFF86381-6737-4329-89DB-1838EF215F5B@virtualized.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For
> political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let
> ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as
> the root TA as recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.
the rirs should get their next (ipv6) address allocations from the nro
pool, eh?
