[164845] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RPKI and Trust Anchor question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Mon Aug 5 15:14:04 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAGFn2k3fU9QQTcygR9q7FJ8R-iHG0d+F0JnYsNA73AA=gre69g@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:08:33 -0700
To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For polit=
ical reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let ICANN/IANA play=
. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as the root TA as recomme=
nded by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.=20
Regards,
-drc
----
Mobile device, sorry about tpyos
On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com> wrote:
> NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an open=
> action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings:
> http://www.nro.net
>=20
> It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address support
> organization, will move on this before NRO does.
>=20
>=20
> Rubens
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Marcel Plug <marcelplug@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hi Nanog,
>>=20
>> Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the effo=
rt
>> to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on this?
>> If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind?
>>=20
>> Most of the information i can find is about 2 years old.
>>=20
>> Any links or info of any kind would be much appreciated.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>>=20
>> Marcel Plug
>>=20
