[164600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jul 22 15:45:06 2013
In-Reply-To: <970945E55BFD8C4EA4CAD74B647A9DC05BE294E5@USIDCWVEMBX05.corp.global.level3.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:44:39 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Siegel, David" <David.Siegel@level3.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Siegel, David <David.Siegel@level3.com> wrote:
> This should now be fixed.
>
> As a general matter of policy, we do filter out 10/8, but somehow the filter list for a customer was empty which then defaults to an implicit accept. We're in the process of improving our config audits to catch this in the future.
>
what happens if they register a route object for 10/8? :)
> Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:LarrySheldon@cox.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:31 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8
>
> On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
>> It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an
>> AS3549 customer.
>
> I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC
> 1918 space.
> --
> Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
> of System Administrators:
> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
> learn from their mistakes.
> (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
>
>
