[164312] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: .nyc - here we go...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Thu Jul 4 18:49:27 2013
In-Reply-To: <37268.1372961504@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:48:54 -0700
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net" <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you can't g=
et for pennies and use successfully.
Matthew Kaufman
(Sent from my iPhone)
On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said:
>=20
>> #insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos
>> (Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their
>> ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die.
>=20
> I'll bite. What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6
> support for a greenfield rollout? It's greenfield, so there's no
> "our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues.
