[164255] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Ciena 6200 clue?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Jul 2 20:01:38 2013
In-Reply-To: <51D364BA.8040102@wvi.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:01:16 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz@wvi.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
it's probably fair to point out that practically all optical vendors
don't actually understand 'ip' and 'routing' and 'systems management'
... try doing ntp with ONS boxes? got ntpv>1? then ... oops :(
never mind the situations where you install a 0/0 route on a
management interface/config and STILL have to /32 route particular
services out the same GW as 0/0 ... (not cisco, another busted
vendor)...
optical people... srsly, get with the program.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz@wvi.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/2013 4:30 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
>>
>> The SE who's onsite is apparently claiming that there is no provision
>> to set a default gateway on the management interface. This seems odd
>> to me.
>
>
> Me too, which is why I've got a call in to another company regarding their
> management LAN port that I can't configure with a default gateway either. At
> least not using the CLI.
>
> Is this common and I just noticed it because it happened to me, or is this
> some collective engineering brain cramp that just took hold?
>
> --
> Jeff Shultz
>
>
>
