[164186] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google's QUIC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jun 28 17:40:16 2013
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:28:39 -0700."
<51CE0007.5050300@bogus.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:38:40 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1372455520_2179P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:28:39 -0700, joel jaeggli said:
> SCTP is used successfully for the purpose for which it was intended,
> which is connecting SS7 switches over IP. It's not as much a posterchild
> for an application agnostic transport as some people would like to think.
OK, I'll bite... does anything else notable actually use it?
--==_Exmh_1372455520_2179P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=gxFp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1372455520_2179P--
