[164177] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google's QUIC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Fagan)
Fri Jun 28 16:51:54 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYJ=Aa8kLFGorbh1wZpVdSR4Wsmb7XdBR8BP8cM1RcvTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:49:08 -0600
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
"In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has the
potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a client,
to be served on a single server." - Google
I'll drink the juice
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Octavio Alvarez
> <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:09:43 -0700, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/06/google-making-the-web-faster-with-protocol-that-reduces-round-trips/?comments=1
>
> >
> > Sounds like a UDP replacement. If this is true, then OS-level support
> will
> > be needed. If they are on this, then it's the perfect opportunity to fix
> > some other problems with the Internet in general.
>
> I'm no genius, but doesn't the article say it's UDP? (in the name of
> the protocol even)
>
> -chris
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
