[164156] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Paetec PI space?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Sparro)
Thu Jun 27 09:51:41 2013
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:51:11 -0400
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <01c001ce72b1$b975dc50$2c6194f0$@webjogger.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/26/2013 5:11 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
> Thanks everyone.
>
> It sounds like (a) customer needs to clarify contract terms with Paetec, and
> (b) unless they have an ongoing relationship, the best long-term plan is to
> renumber.
>
> I did check reg dates on the blocks, and it is much more recent than the
> customer led me to believe (or than I interpreted) ... so I suspect this is
> less something which simply dropped off the map and more of an above-board
> and possibly ongoing relationship than I suspected. The customer does
> provide voice service, so there may be something going on behind the scenes
> which makes sense from an authoritative routing perspective.
>
> Thanks for your help. This customer seems to be responsible so I suspect I
> may not have all the details and overstated the issue.
And just one more note to complicate things a little more for you.
Paetec was acquired by Windstream last year. I hope that doesn't make
it even harder for you to find answers to your questions from the
service provider, but I suspect that it will.
--
Dave Sparro
