[164135] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Paetec PI space?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler James R)
Wed Jun 26 14:06:55 2013
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <009801ce7295$ef992dd0$cecb8970$@webjogger.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:04:50 -0400
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:52 PM, "Adam Greene" <maillist@webjogger.net> =
wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back =
in
> mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though =
their
> relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Is this a common situation?
No data either way.
> Does the customer risk having that space
> reclaimed by Paetec at some point
What does the contract say?
> , or is it safe to assume they will
> continue to be able to route trouble-free for years to come?
It is never save to assume anything, but especially not save to assume =
"trouble-free for years to come".
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Adam
>=20
