[164063] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Security over SONET/SDH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Mon Jun 24 16:04:29 2013
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:04:11 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: surfer@mauigateway.com, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20130624125556.D485E358@m0005296.ppops.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/24/13 12:55 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> ----- william.allen.simpson wrote: -----
> And at $189,950 MSRP, obviously every ISP is dashing out the door
> for a pair for each and every long haul fiber link. ;-)
> ----------------------------------------
>
> It's the same as buying, say, .nanog... >;-)
>
>
>
>
> --- gdt@gdt.id.au wrote:
> From: Glen Turner <gdt@gdt.id.au>
> On 23/06/2013, at 1:21 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
>> What security protocols are folks using to protect SONET/SDH?
>> At what speeds?
> "Excuse me NSA, can I have export approval for one KG-530 SDH
> encryptor?" What are the odds :-)
>
> And how would we know that the "export model" isn't simply
> providing a more convenient backdoor for the NSA?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> That's why I'm trying to follow up on the original question. Is
> there something similar the global public can use to secure their
> connections that is not government designed. This is even more
> important on microwave shots when security is desired.
plenty of standardized RF link-layers support strong encryption.
> scott
>
>
>
>
