[164024] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PDU recommendations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Caruso, Anthony)
Sun Jun 23 20:39:31 2013
From: "Caruso, Anthony" <acaruso@mre-consulting.com>
To: Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:39:20 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAJvB4t=UtuiZRL+FNHZ80Kz_xHsCfEK7d=+XZB1ZkAYPnCv-yw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I used an APC (I think) 1U PDU at a client a few years back. The bugger wa=
s it wasn't deep, so after the cabinet started getting really populated, th=
e back outlets were a PITA. We started using the full-height back of the c=
abinet PDU strips (one on each side for A & B power respectively) after tha=
t SNAFU.
-T
On Jun 23, 2013, at 7:27 PM, "Blake Dunlap" <ikiris@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nick, he meant he was using APC PDUs, not APC UPSs with PDU functionality=
...
>
>
> APC is also the PDU vendor I would recommend.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And now for the stupid question. Is there an APC UPS in a U form factor
>> with sufficient
>> outlets that can act kind of like a PDU, only better?
>>
>> PS If it has stonith capabilities ever better!!!
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Nick.
>>
>>
________________________________
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended=
recipient(s) and contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any u=
nauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you a=
re not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail an=
d destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.
