[164001] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Security over SONET/SDH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Sun Jun 23 10:54:25 2013
In-Reply-To: <51C6FC7B.20703@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:54:15 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:47 AM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/23/13 12:48 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>>
>> By security protocol do you mean encrypting the traffic?
>> Like what a Fastlane does?
>>
>>
>> http://www.gdc4s.com/Documents/Products/SecureVoiceData/NetworkEncryption/GD-FASTLANE-w.pdf
>>
> That's rather a surprising choice (ATM product) for an IP network.
> Please describe what backbone you are running that uses a FASTLANE?
I'd be surprised if a civilian org could buy a fastlane device,..
maybe they moved out of the gov't only world though since the last
time I saw one? It does claim to do oc-48 rate sonet though.
> Hopefully, other folks are securing their PPP or ethernet packets?
>
>
