[163985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sat Jun 22 12:43:04 2013
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJL_ZMO0ZuyqV+sjgbAEfBgDzGcANFx=_eFSjBnTLTvwLNZf-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:38:41 +0200
To: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
When you convert your botnet to a business model, you have to change the =
name. If it's a business, the politically correct term is "Elastic Cloud =
Computing"
Owen
On Jun 22, 2013, at 6:19 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Botnets to help with peering ratio's could be a new business model? :)
>=20
>=20
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Christopher Morrow =
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>=20
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Neil Harris <neil@tonal.clara.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> On 22/06/13 13:08, Matthew Petach wrote:
>>>> That's easily solved by padding the ACK to 1500 bytes as well.
>>>>=20
>>>> Matt
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Or indeed by the media player sending large amounts of traffic back =
to
>> the
>>> CDN via auxiliary HTTP POST requests?
>>=20
>> ah... botnet... how I love thee?
>>=20
>>=20
