[163485] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Keith Medcalf)
Sun Jun 9 14:01:57 2013
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:01:29 -0600
In-Reply-To: <6BAB4939-1DC1-4E40-8DB3-5CF9E0C87793@gmail.com>
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf@dessus.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Of course the access isn't direct -- there is a firewall and a router i=
n between. The access is indirect.
---
() ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason L. Sparks [mailto:jlsparks@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 09 June, 2013 04:24
> To: ku po
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project
>
> To be fair, the reporting (initially) claimed the providers were gran=
ting
> the USG "access directly to their servers." It's understandable and
> appropriate that the providers pushed back against that apparently
> erroneous reporting.
>
> Jason
>
> On Jun 8, 2013, at 22:44, ku po <cciehelps@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What is the point to argue whether they have the capacity to proces=
s all
> > the data?
> > They DON'T need to build expensive systems.
> > They just need to make sure when they ask your company for informat=
ion,
> > these information are available for them and fast enough.
> > So the statement that saying "we don't give them direct access" mea=
ns
> > nothing!!!
> > The right question is IS THERE A DIRECT CHANNEL for them to ask you=
for
> > information without providing all the evidence( how could they show=
you
> all
> > the evidence when it is security related??), which you can't deny =
their
> > access.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:20 AM, James Harrison
> <james@talkunafraid.co.uk>wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2013 16:31, William Herrin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:25 AM, jamie rishaw <j@arpa.com> wrote:
> >>>> Just wait until we find out dark and lit private fiber is gettin=
g
> >>>> vampired.
> >>>
> >>> Why wait?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/politics/20submarine.html?_r=3D=
0
> >>>
> >>> -Bill
> >>
> >> In a similar vein, a new PRISM slide was released by the Guardian =
this
> >> morning:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-prism-server-
> collection-facebook-google
> >>
> >> Doesn't specifically say private fiber - just "fiber cables and
> >> infrastructure". May just refer to fiber to/from/within complying
> >> company infrastructure, ofc, not necessarily anything else.
> >>
> >> They also apparently have a web 2.0 compliant dashboard with a cat=
chy
> >> name and pop-ups with big numbers in: Boundless Informant.
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informan=
t-
> global-datamining
> >>
> >> Speaking from the other side of the pond it's interesting to see w=
here
> >> this is going. GCHQ (the UK NSA equivalent) are being asked stern
> >> questions by the government about their involvement and if they've
> >> been asking the NSA for UK citizens' data (since they're not allow=
ed
> >> to collect it themselves).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> James Harrison
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> >>
> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlGzyl4ACgkQ22kkGnnJQAwVfQCePSYz9p5P95bnWYbp4YA2SeQD
> >> HeQAn0AOnReV6DQC0Y3k5P046BbFnBUJ
> >> =3DauDI
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>
> >>
