[163318] in North American Network Operators' Group
IP4 address conservation method
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Jun 4 18:34:27 2013
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 00:34:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I read:
http://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/tues.general.Papandreou.conservation.24.pdf
I would like to point out RFC 3069. On most cisco equipment this is done
using static routes and "ip unnumbered".
So my question is basically: What am I missing? Why can't data center guys
not build their network the same way regular ETTH is done? Either one vlan
per customer and sharing the IPv4 subnet between several vlans, or having
several customers in the same vlan but use antispoofing etc (IETF SAVI-wg
functionality) to handle the security stuff?
One vlan per customer also works very well with IPv6.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
