[163048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for Netflow analysis package
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri May 17 11:25:18 2013
To: surfer@mauigateway.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700."
<20130516151622.A0F49051@resin04.mta.everyone.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:24:00 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1368804240_2644P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, "Scott Weeks" said:
> You haven't been here long have you...
>
> He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does
> not get UCE from posting to NANOG.
Actually, I think Thomas Cannon was making the opposite point - that if
he's going to spam us all with a 260 word disclaimer, it could have been
expanded to 263 words and add 'No cold calls'. Or just have that and lose
the other 260 words that make absolutely no sense on a NANOG posting.
--==_Exmh_1368804240_2644P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=vL4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1368804240_2644P--
