[162975] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISIS and OSPF together
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon May 13 05:31:35 2013
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:31:18 +0100
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPLq3UM3wrUQ8cwY9QcKihc7ijL+jSfUgPPFeWxb6SguzSaPgA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Folks could, at least theoretically, use ISIS or OSPF multi instance/multi
> topology extensions to support IPv4 and IPv6 topologies. This way they
> would only need to run a single protocol and thereby requiring expertise in
> handling only one protocol.
and, as is-is supports 4 and 6, why do you use ospf in this scenario?
randy
