[162884] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Illegal usage of AS51888 (and PI 91.220.85.0/24) from AS42989 and
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Vitkovsky)
Mon May 6 03:31:57 2013
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
To: 'Nick Hilliard' <nick@foobar.org>, 'Christopher Morrow'
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51840010.4050006@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:31:41 +0200
Cc: 'NANOG' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 8:21 PM
> From a deployment point of view, there's a pretty big gap between poking
around with rpki and actually dropping prefixes on your routers. I don't
see that the rpki data will be good enough for the latter any time soon, but
maybe one day.
Well you can always jus lower the preference for a particular prefix based
on the roa state or roa missing.
Than it is solely up to your customers whether they bother to register their
prefixes to avoid hijacks or not, as you'll be ready on your part.
adam
