[162512] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Ethernet CFM & LMI vs EBGP between PE-CE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Vitkovsky)
Wed Apr 24 04:20:59 2013
From: Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky@swan.sk>
To: 'Deniz Aydin' <deniz.aydin@turknet.net.tr>, 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <540AE58F-9D7A-4B30-82B7-11E884D2C989@turknet.net.tr>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:19:57 +0200
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Well CFM and Ethernet LMI is great help in L2VPN services to pin point =
the failed portion of the L2 circuit.=20
For L3VPN services I rather relay on BFD over PE-CE link and BGP PIC =
Edge in the backbone to achieve fast convergence.=20
adam
