[162375] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google Wants to Create a Dotless Domain Called "Search"..?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joshua Goldbard)
Thu Apr 11 13:29:41 2013
From: Joshua Goldbard <j@2600hz.com>
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:29:28 +0000
In-Reply-To: <ac9i5h1yh6vqjkplum7urfbf.1365700281865@email.android.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm hoping google is doing this for m2m and not human interaction, but I co=
uld be wrong.
I just envision years of re-educating grandparents and less technical users=
and I'm dreading it.
Cheers,
Joshua
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:14 AM, "Warren Bailey" <wbailey@satelliteintelligenc=
egroup.com> wrote:
> I try not to flood Nanog with articles, but I thought I'd ask for some op=
inions on this. For the moment, most browsers treat a single line with no t=
ld as a search request, why have a tld-less tld? Would this not open the do=
or for others to claim they need a word as a tld (cisco =3D http://routers =
or Al Gore http://internets), and how would that be handled by most modern(=
ish) browsers and devices?
>=20
>=20
> http://m.gizmodo.com/5994354/google-wants-to-create-a-dotless-domain-call=
ed-search
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
