[162285] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Mon Apr 8 11:07:22 2013
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:06:49 -0500
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <5162DB0A.2000908@bogus.com>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/8/2013 9:58 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> That happened a long time ago. I realize the people like to think of
> wireless providers as different, they really aren't. A big chuck of
> our mobile gaming customers come to us via carrier operated nat
> translators. Some of them now come to us via ipv6, most do not.
Yeah, forgive me. I have a tendency to forget the mobile carriers,
probably because some of them started with CGN. One of my customers just
started a new cell network. He's burning through /20's like they are
nothing in a short time frame (and it's a small geographic area).
They're deploying CGN so we don't run out of addresses and can recover
what we've already burned through. IPv6 for their cellular didn't seem
high priority either.
Jack
