[162279] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Mon Apr 8 08:02:47 2013
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <5162ACA9.1050508@fud.no>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Tore Anderson wrote:
> If this is to be called "translation", then any tunneling mechanism that
> works by stacking layer-3 headers, including GRE, IPIP, ESP, and
> proto-41, must be also called "translation".
Oki, my bad. I read
https://ripe65.ripe.net/presentations/91-townsley-map-ripe65-ams-sept-24-2012.pdf
and obviously didn't understand. I thought only the payload was
encapsulated, not the complete IPv4 packet. It said "replace IPv4 header
with IPv6 header" and I missed that this was for MAP-T, not MAP-E).
Thanks for explaining. I understand why MAP-E is not translation now.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
