[162255] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rajiv Asati (rajiva))
Sun Apr 7 21:21:38 2013
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 01:21:26 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA16D726-8B13-4DAE-94C1-6AB609002712@mac.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dual-stack in the home networks will stay with us for a long time (beyond 2=
020!) until v4-only user devices and v4-only apps get refreshed.
Of course, this doesn't mean that the ISP access needs to stay dual-stack, =
thanks to MAP, 464XLAT etc.
Cheers,
Rajiv
Sent from my Phone
On Apr 7, 2013, at 3:15 AM, "Fabien Delmotte" <fdelmotte1@mac.com> wrote:
> CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism thr=
ough IPv6
> At the end (IPv6 at home) you will need at list :
> Dual stack or NAT64/ DNS64
>=20
> My 2 cents
>=20
> On Apr 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>=20
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>=20
>>> I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support =
v6 would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through that=
:(
>>=20
>> IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion. =
Would you be less upset if there was IPv6 access and CPE based DS Lite (ie =
your IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)?
>>=20
>> CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth=
is IPv6.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>=20
