[162218] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 80 km BiDi XFPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Sat Apr 6 14:52:01 2013
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Thomas Weible - FLEXOPTIX'" <Thomas.Weible@flexoptix.net>
In-Reply-To: <3C73F7533E17CE4BA3558C3026772EC83FC93F95@postman.intranet.flexoptix.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 13:50:34 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks, using an external CWDM mux is an option we're explorering.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Weible - FLEXOPTIX [mailto:Thomas.Weible@flexoptix.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 5:51 AM
To: Matt Addison; Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: AW: 80 km BiDi XFPs
Matt Addison [mailto:matt.addison@lists.evilgeni.us] wrote:
>
> How much spare margin do you have? Could you roll your own with a pair
> of mismatched (C|D)WDM XFPs and a mux on each end?
Typically you have 23dB powerbudget for the ZR (CWDM or DWDM) - maybe +2 dB
through selection of TOSA. A CWDM Mux will take 2dB and a small DWDM Mux
approx. 4dB - you need two of them. This will drag your overall
link-powerbudget below 20dB.
It might work if you add a FEC (either on the linecard or the XFP itself).
This will add approx. 5dB to your powerbudget of 23dB. Take a CWDM Mux and
fire x-crossed on 1550 and 1570 (maybe 1530) and you will face an
attenuation of approx. 0,2 - 0,25dB/km. This could work and you should be
able to transmit 80km to 90km. It's worth a test - also to figure out if
dispersion will have an impact or not.
Thomas
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 19:16, Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone aware of a reputable supplier of 80 km BiDi XFPs? My regular
> > supplier of generics doesn't have an option for us, but I would really
like
> > to avoid leasing additional fibers.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
>
>
